cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
Therefore, Should the intent to cause injury is proven and it is actually further proven that during the ordinary course of nature, that injury would end in death, that matter is currently objective and the intention to get rid of (the main ingredient that must
Some sites may well specialize in specific areas of law, even though others offer a broader database. Factors to think about when picking a website consist of the comprehensiveness of your database, the ease of navigation, as well as the availability of advanced search options.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to really make it suitable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified via the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are in the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle will not be legally seem, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really issue to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion could possibly be thought of, however, we've been crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, issue to availability of vacancy issue for the approval with the competent authority.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade with the accused has not been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to acquire advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image of the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to your accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to discover the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced pictures. Other than, the images shown to the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity until he was set up for an identification parade. Making pictures of your accused publically, either by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or system, would create doubt during the proceedings on the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there is no probability for that witness to see the accused before going to the identification parade. The accused should not be shown on the witness in person or through any other mode, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or perhaps the press or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed through the respondent/Institute, these rules may well not have the operates within a clear legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. fourteen. In view of what is discussed higher than, without touching the merits from the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of your petition is sustained plus the petition is held to generally be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 in click here the Constitution for that reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio of your judgment passed from the Supreme Court while in the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that whilst considering the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to take into account the merit of the many eligible candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who will be found to be most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed by the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part on the respondent department.
The issue here is that an accused could say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted a result of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.
after release from the jail he dropped interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of your view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion could possibly be viewed as, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue on the approval from the competent authority.
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (three), has long been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access into the public to strategy the superior courts as well as subordinate courts on environment related issues.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by accomplishing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently unsafe that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death of your such person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are recognized by executive businesses based on statutes.